← Search

Christine McKinlay

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 7W–19L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history26 matches
L
2026-09-08 · CACM PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bev Howell championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-02 · CACM PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Angerman
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · CACM PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bev Howell
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Angerman
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
Default
2026-05-28 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Angerman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-07 · CACM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Suzann Gobis
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-04-30 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Beletic
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-10 · CACM PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Forman championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-24 · CACM PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Forman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-07-10 · CACM PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Forman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-06-26 · CACM PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peggy Moody
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-08-07 · CACM ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Forman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 47.8% of games
7.0
20%
3W–12L · 31.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 73% of the time
#3 Doubles
73%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer