← Search

Gayle Millington

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
DANVILLE, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 54W–77L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history131 matches
W
2026-05-12 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Blom
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fedwa Booth
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Florence Huang
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-19 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Willis
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-15 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chandavone Reeder
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-14 · PLEASANTON 18MX7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Millington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-02-21 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Roach
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-25 · PLEASANTON 18MX7.0B · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Millington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6
W
2026-01-24 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Blom
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-01-17 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chandavone Reeder
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-10 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Romeda Arsanjani
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 62.7% of games
3.5
35.7%
25W–45L · 44.1% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 45.9% of games
7.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 42.5% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.9% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 31% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova