← Search

Michelle Cooke

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Danville, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 78W–89L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history167 matches
L
2026-09-23 · PLEASANTON CW6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Diana Rosdahl
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-19 · PLEASANTON CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Fedwa Booth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-12 · PLEASANTON CW6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Malou Matthew
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-14 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5B · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Weiss
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5B · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Malou Matthew
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5B · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karina Newsom
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-23 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5B · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · GREENBROOK RS 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sylvia McCorriston
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-16 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5B · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sylvia McCorriston
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-06 · GREENBROOK RS 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sylvia McCorriston
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · GREENBROOK RS 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Garrahan
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-02 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5B · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen de Martini
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
68.1%
32W–15L · 55.8% of games
3.5
21.8%
12W–43L · 40.4% of games
6.5
52.9%
18W–16L · 51% of games
7.0
50%
7W–7L · 47.9% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 62.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
40 matches
#1 Singles
13%
22 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova