← Search

Margaret Worden

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
WALNUT CREEK, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
197 matches · 86W–111L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history197 matches
L
2026-10-28 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW7.5B · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Italia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-12 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW7.5B · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heather Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-03 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW7.5B · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Yuko Umezawa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-02 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW7.5B · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Aneja
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-30 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW7.5B · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen Schaffel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-20 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle McDermott championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-09 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronit Jorgensen
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-07 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Ng
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-07 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW4.0C · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Korich
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-06 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Golinski
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5A · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-24 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle McDermott
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
54.9%
28W–23L · 49.1% of games
4.0
34.2%
25W–48L · 44.3% of games
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 53.5% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.9% of games
7.5
40%
12W–18L · 45.2% of games
8.0
56.7%
17W–13L · 50.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
48 matches
#1 Singles
9%
18 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova