← Search

Rebecca Tatman

WINDSOR, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 47W–94L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Tatman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
L
2026-07-06 · LT TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Cheri Gipson / Cheryl Johnson
2026-06-29 · LT TEAL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Houldsworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-22 · LT TEAL · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · LT TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Priscilla Dressen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-01 · LT TEAL · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Emilie Gunderson / Mary Wilson
2026-05-11 · LT GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Reina Clouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-27 · LT GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-13 · LT GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-08-18 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with SPENCER SNYDER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
Tammy Bell / Mary Wilson
2025-08-04 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-07-21 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Welch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-14 · HMTC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
32.2%
28W–59L · 45% of games
7.0mixed
55%
11W–9L · 50.8% of games
7.5mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 48.5% of games
8.0mixed
15%
3W–17L · 38.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
28 matches
#1 Singles
13%
18 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova