← Search

Steve Greco

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pittsburgh, PA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 45W–39L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history84 matches
L
2026-07-25 · AMD/AMD - D'Angelo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Kejas
loading the estimate
2-6
W
2026-07-25 · AMD/AMD - D'Angelo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karl Boye
loading the estimate
6-4
L
2026-07-11 · Lobsters 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Haley
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-02 · Lobsters 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Kejas
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Haley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tony Levis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
Dennis Rafferty / Eric Campbell
2024-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alex Parrish
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
L
2024-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Thomas
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Demark
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-05-04 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Thomas
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2023-08-06 · AMD · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lane Stoner
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-08-05 · AMD · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephen Kaufman
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 61.6% of games
4.5
13.3%
2W–13L · 38.5% of games
8.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 61.8% of games
9.0
50%
3W–3L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.5% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 51.2% of games
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal