← Search

David Schlosser

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lititz, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 72W–33L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history105 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Bent Creek - Houston · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Schnably
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-18 · Bent Creek - Houston · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theo Vogt-Post
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-03 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Veronis championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-03 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Veronis championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-09-13 · CPD/- 8.0 Men - Stauffer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Veronis
loading the estimate
6-1
W
2026-09-13 · CPD/- 8.0 Men - Stauffer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Staman
loading the estimate
6-4
W
2026-07-25 · CPD · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Don Hutchison
loading the estimate
7-5
W
2026-07-25 · CPD · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Don Hutchison
loading the estimate
6-2
W
2026-06-07 · RCW - Campbell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Staman
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · RCW - Campbell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave Henneman
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-17 · RCW - Campbell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Staman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-08-10 · Manheim - Berkley · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Loercher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 55.9% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
88.1%
37W–5L · 63.4% of games
9.0
20%
1W–4L · 38.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
19W–19L · 51.3% of games
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 59.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe