← Search

Irene Zimmet

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tampa, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
225 matches · 103W–122L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history225 matches
L
2026-10-29 · Arbor Greene LOVAS/Gaier · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geri Burke
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-25 · Arbor Greene Endless Summer LOVAS/Burke · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marcella Guido
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-24 · Arbor Greene LOVAS/Gaier · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-05 · Arbor Greene Summer LOVAs/Gaier · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jody McNamee
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-28 · Arbor Greene Ace of Hearts/Zimmet · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Tupler
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-15 · Arbor Greene Summer LOVAs/Gaier · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Orwa
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-11 · Arbor Greene Summer LOVAs/Gaier · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marcella Guido
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-10 · Arbor Greene Ace of Hearts/Zimmet · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Tupler
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · Arbor Green/LOVAs / Burke · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Tupler
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-21 · Arbor Green/LOVAs / Burke · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea McKinney
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-07 · Arbor Green/LOVAs / Burke · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Tupler
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · Arbor Green/LOVAs / Burke · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams84 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 55.1% of games
3.5
43.5%
70W–91L · 48.1% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
6W–6L · 50.6% of games
7.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 52.2% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 49.2% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 40.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
35 matches
#1 Singles
13%
29 matches
#2 Singles
8%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert