← Search

Tracey Tupler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tampa, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 77W–94L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history171 matches
W
2026-10-18 · Arbor Greene Endless Summer LOVAS/Burke · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barbara Collins
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-10-04 · Arbor Greene Endless Summer LOVAS/Burke · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Wilhelm-Mace
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5
L
2026-10-01 · Arbor Greene LOVAS/Gaier · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jiyoung Yoon
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-24 · Arbor Greene LOVAS/Gaier · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jody McNamee
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-20 · Arbor Greene Endless Summer LOVAS/Burke · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Wilhelm-Mace
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-29 · Arbor Greene Summer LOVAs/Gaier · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elvie Virgili
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-28 · Arbor Greene Ace of Hearts/Zimmet · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Zimmet
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-18 · Arbor Greene Summer LOVAs/Gaier · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jody McNamee
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-10 · Arbor Greene Ace of Hearts/Zimmet · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Zimmet
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · Arbor Greene Summer LOVAs/Gaier · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jody McNamee
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · Arbor Greene Ace of Hearts/Zimmet · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Gaier
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · Arbor Green/LOVAs / Burke · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Zimmet
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
40.6%
41W–60L · 47.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
58.8%
20W–14L · 55.5% of games
7.0
53.6%
15W–13L · 51.9% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
35 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer