← Search

Paul Ketrick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chatsworth, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 93W–82L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history175 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Burbank Breaking Bad/Steltz-Angrisani/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yeonhak Jung
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-19 · Burbank Breaking Bad/Steltz-Angrisani/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glen Chester
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · Breaking Bad 55/Chester/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Glen Chester
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-24 · Racketeers7.0/Jung-Angrisani/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Sato mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · Breaking Bad/Lenarsky-Angrisani/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gonzalo Mendez
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-26 · Breaking Bad 55/Chester/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alvin Chong
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-12 · Breaking Bad/Lenarsky-Angrisani/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gonzalo Mendez
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-28 · Breaking Bad/Steltz-Lenars-Angrisani/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gonzalo Mendez
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-22 · Simply Smashing 7.0/Galaviz/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tia Ayers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · Simply Smashing 7.0/Galaviz/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Azatuhi Chinaryan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-22 · Breaking Bad/Steltz-Lenars-Angrisani/Burbank · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aldo Angrisani
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-02-15 · Simply Smashing 7.0/Galaviz/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Azatuhi Chinaryan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.3% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
52.6%
50W–45L · 50.7% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
52.2%
12W–11L · 49.2% of games
2.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 70.8% of games
6.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 48.8% of games
7.0mixed
59.3%
16W–11L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
68 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
38 matches
#1 Singles
9%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King