← Search

Terry Wingo

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Castaic, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
174 matches · 55W–119L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history174 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Paseo United/Zeltser/Paseo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mel Matibag
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-11 · Double Shots/Opp/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monica Kaplan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-28 · Double Shots/Opp/Paseo · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Vaughn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-27 · Paseo United3.5/Zeltser-VanVleet/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gil Garteiz
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-14 · Paseo United3.5/Zeltser-VanVleet/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parthiv Daggolu
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-14 · Paseo United3.5/Zeltser-VanVleet/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gil Garteiz
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-07 · Double Shots/Opp/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monica Kaplan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-30 · Paseo United3.5/Zeltser-VanVleet/Paseo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with MARK LIKER
loading the estimate
1-2
W
2026-05-09 · Paseo United3.5/Zeltser-VanVleet/Paseo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hp Park
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-19 · Paseo United3.5/Zeltser-VanVleet/Paseo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angel Tirado
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · Paseo United3.5/Zeltser-VanVleet/Paseo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jorge Perazzo
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-05 · Double Shots/Opp/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with TANIA JANICEK mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
20%
1W–4L · 41.1% of games
3.0
40%
8W–12L · 43.2% of games
3.5
27.8%
22W–57L · 42% of games
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 42.4% of games
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.5% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
30.2%
13W–30L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
41 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams