← Search

Mel Matibag

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Stevenson Ranch, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
177 matches · 91W–86L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history177 matches
L
2026-10-31 · Mixed Nuts/Ryan-Matibag/Paseo · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with TANIA JANICEK mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-25 · Paseo United/Zeltser/Paseo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Wingo
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-30 · Mixed Nuts/Ryan-Matibag/Paseo · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with TANIA JANICEK mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · Mixed Nuts/Matibag-Ryan/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amber Calhoun-berger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-28 · Mixed Nuts/Matibag-Ryan/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy HASBANIAN mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-27 · Paseo United3.5/Zeltser-VanVleet/Paseo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Wambolt
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · Paseo United3.5/Zeltser-VanVleet/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rafael Puno
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-12 · Paseo United3.5/Zeltser-VanVleet/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with MARK LIKER
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-04 · Paseo United3.5/Zeltser-VanVleet/Paseo · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacobus Admiraal
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-29 · Paseo United3.5/Zeltser/Paseo · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-28 · Paseo United3.5/Zeltser/Paseo · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-14 · Pure Drive/Zbojniewicz/Paseo · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marah Hogendorn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 77% of games
3.0
65.2%
45W–24L · 56.4% of games
3.5
31.8%
7W–15L · 43.9% of games
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 64.3% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 52.6% of games
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
54.3%
19W–16L · 51.8% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
8W–16L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
29 matches
#1 Singles
14%
24 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer