← Search

Alex Lehmann

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Van Nuys, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 35W–39L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history74 matches
W
2026-11-01 · PTC Tri Mixers/Bennett-Mateos/Porter · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Brett Bennett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-25 · 40 Love/Lula/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sergio Martinez
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
Default
2026-10-12 · PTC Tri Mixers/Bennett-Mateos/Porter · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Haggett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-27 · 40 Love/Lula/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monte Donovan
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-26 · Pekingese Tennis Club7.0/Bennett-Sanchez/Scholl · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hillary Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-28 · Pekingese Tennis Club7.0/Bennett-Sanchez/Scholl · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hillary Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · Pekingese Tennis Club7.0/Bennett-Sanchez/Scholl · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hillary Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · Pekingese Tennis Club7.0/Bennett-Sanchez/Scholl · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Casper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · 40 Love/Lula-Dubkin/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sergio Martinez
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-01 · 40 Love/Lula-Dubkin/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aditya Moorthy
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-28 · Pekingese Tennis Club 7.0/Bennett-Sanchez/Scholl · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hillary Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-02-01 · Pekingese Tennis Club 7.0/Bennett-Sanchez/Scholl · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hillary Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.6% of games
3.5
44.1%
15W–19L · 47.3% of games
2.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 65.1% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams