Search

Gina DeCola

Houston, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 86W–87L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Gina DeCola to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history173 matches
W
2026-08-11 · Sweet Shots · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Beighey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · Hitsters · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli Sharkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
Debora Holdren / Susan Callahan
2026-08-04 · Sweet Shots · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heather Hakos-Hruby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-02 · Glen Creek Vipers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Hakos-Hruby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · Hitsters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli Sharkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · Glen Creek Vipers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jody Frey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Kristen MacKey / Amy Jenkins
2026-07-25 · Hitsters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli Sharkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-22 · Mt Lebanon · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ingrid Meenen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-14 · Sweet Shots · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heather Hakos-Hruby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Ann Dougherty / Lauren Kanavy
2026-07-11 · Tennis Chicks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Seekely
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · Sweet Shots · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicole Donoghue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-28 · Tennis Chicks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Albaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.1% of games
3.5
61.8%
34W–21L · 55% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 25% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 52.6% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.7% of games
7.0mixed
50.9%
28W–27L · 49.6% of games
7.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer