← Search

Lynn Holehouse

New Berlin, WI
3.5C year-end 2025
68 matches · 41W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.48
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
62%
stay 3.5
38%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 89% stay · 11% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.40. Lower than today’s 3.48 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
New Berlin · 3.5
3 of 6
WI · 3.5
30 of 187
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Lynn is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lynn has been 3.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Lynn has gone from the 49th to the 84th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
55.3%
26W–21L · 52.2% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 62.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history68 matches
W
Kathryn Tweet / Patricia Napgezek
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with PATRICIA EICHTEN
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Karen Parks / Olof Jonsdottir
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Erdmann
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Julie Courtney / Christine Laemmar'Faber
2026-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cissy Buchta
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-3
L
Therese Stockhausen / Holly Shepherd
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrice Michaels
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Mary E Timm / Barb Seidl
2026-06-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary Morby
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrice Michaels
+0.021better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrice Michaels
+0.019better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Cana Comer / Lauren Hansen
2026-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth LambrechtScasny
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Linda Koenig / Lynn Doyle
2026-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Kuzmanovic
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-0
W
Linda Koenig / Nora Pecor
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sylwia Enerson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-2
L
Mary Smith / Tracy Reese
2026-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sylwia Enerson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary Morby
+0.043better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.