← Search

Jennifer Donovan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ridgewood, NJ
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 8W–12L · seasons 2018–2023
Match history20 matches
L
2023-07-17 · Upper Ridgewood Racqueteers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennie Galvin
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-07-10 · Upper Ridgewood Racqueteers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Montalbano
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-06 · Love Em and Leave Em Again · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Kelly
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-5
L
2022-05-07 · Party At Net · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Newman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-03-12 · Party At Net · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Newman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
2019-12-08 · Team Heath/Dugan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erika Bradley
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2019-10-06 · Team Heath/Dugan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trisha Dugan
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-4, 0-1
L
2019-07-30 · Heath/Dugan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Heath
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2019-07-17 · NJ: Bergen: Love Em and Leave Em · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Paterson
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2019-07-16 · Heath/Dugan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danielle Cawood
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2019-06-19 · NJ: Bergen: Love Em and Leave Em · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Boiardi
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2019-06-05 · NJ: Bergen: Love Em and Leave Em · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Evelyne Laine
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
50%
6W–6L · 47.7% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 46.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert