← Search

Sydney Crabtree

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 98W–41L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Sydney Crabtree to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alex Wong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-09-03 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alex Wong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-01 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alex Wong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-27 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alex Wong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alex Wong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-16 · Bringin' the Racket · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Zimmerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Emily Flores championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Benjamin Schlichting / Stephanie Skarwecki
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · with Victor Do championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Stephen Slubar / Jaclyn Bermudez
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Malmstrom championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Mark Malmstrom championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · Volleyciraptors · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jee Hur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
80%
12W–3L · 63.8% of games
4.0
75.5%
40W–13L · 59.5% of games
4.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.4% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.5% of games
8.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 55.8% of games
8.5mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 62.4% of games
9.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 59.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
36 matches
#1 Singles
25%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
21 matches
#2 Singles
12%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova