← Search

Tricia Ehrisman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Plano, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 55W–65L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history120 matches
L
2026-10-23 · Team 10 High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Kirlin
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-10-20 · Team 10 High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Louise Melcher
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-16 · Team 10 High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Jones
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-11 · Team 10 High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Jones
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Robbins
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-07 · High Point/Tucker-Wise W3.5T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Jones
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-20 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Celeste Schmidt
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-13 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Jones
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-12 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Jones
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-06 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Celeste Schmidt
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-04 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Kirlin
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-01-16 · High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deganit Gal
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
44.4%
52W–65L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert