← Search

Karin Dayton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wayzata, MN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 42W–23L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history65 matches
L
2026-03-18 · Stoneybrook Young/French · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Bickelmann
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-02-18 · Stoneybrook Young/French · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Bickelmann
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-02-04 · Stoneybrook Young/French · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Anderson
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-14 · Stoneybrook Young/French · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Bickelmann
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-04-02 · Stoneybrook Young · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Anderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-03-26 · Stoneybrook Young · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jose Hill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-03-05 · Stoneybrook Young · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Anderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-02-12 · Stoneybrook Young · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Anderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-01-15 · Stoneybrook Young · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Anderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-11-25 · Stankovsky-Boline · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Samuelson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-19 · Wagener: Wise Aces · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Donovan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-05-15 · Wagener: Wise Aces · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dede Montgomery
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 52.5% of games
7.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 61.2% of games
8.0
60.9%
14W–9L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams