← Search

Ian Fuster

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 40W–67L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Ian Fuster to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
2026-09-03 · JTchirkow/IFuster (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with JACK TCHIRKOW
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-20 · JTchirkow/IFuster (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with JACK TCHIRKOW
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-13 · JTchirkow/IFuster (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with JACK TCHIRKOW
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
John Howard
2026-07-22 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-21 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Fenwick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sydney Gaston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Sturgeon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-23 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Self mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-22 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-13 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Sturgeon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
55%
11W–9L · 49.9% of games
4.0
23.3%
7W–23L · 40.1% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 47.7% of games
7.5
56.5%
13W–10L · 47.6% of games
8.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 30.4% of games
4.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 40.3% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.5% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 28.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
18 matches
#2 Singles
12%
13 matches
#1 Singles
10%
11 matches
#3 Singles
8%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe