← Search

Nicole Schreck

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Alpharetta, GA
3.0M year-end 2024
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
7 matches · 0W–7L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history7 matches
L
2026-04-03 · Oxford Mill (Nicole Schreck)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Curtis mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-26 · Oxford Mill (Nicole Schreck)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Thomas mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob Hadley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mohit Dhir mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
Adam Baldwin / Julia Flannery
2024-03-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob Hadley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
2019-12-05 · Oxford Mill (Dori Christensen)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Blake
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2019-11-14 · Oxford Mill (Dori Christensen)* · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 31.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
2 matches
#2 Singles
14%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer