← Search

Stephen Mikolajczak

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Johns Creek, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 41W–33L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history74 matches
W
2026-10-02 · Cambridge (Stephen Mikolajczak)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Mikolajczak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-25 · Cambridge (Stephen Mikolajczak)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Mikolajczak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-29 · Cambridge (Brooks Stewart)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patrick Matarrese
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-15 · Cambridge (Brooks Stewart)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Fike
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-08 · Cambridge (Brooks Stewart)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Stephens
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-17 · Cambridge (Eric Shack)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Shack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-27 · Cambridge (Eric Shack)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Mikolajczak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-20 · Cambridge (Eric Shack)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Mikolajczak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-13 · Cambridge (Eric Shack)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colette Jeffery mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-10 · Blackburn (Jean Horstman)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Mikolajczak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-10-03 · Blackburn (Jean Horstman)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Mikolajczak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-09-26 · Blackburn (Jean Horstman)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Mikolajczak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
56.1%
23W–18L · 52.1% of games
3.5mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 43.3% of games
6.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal