← Search

Karthik Ramesh

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
SLINGERLANDS, NY
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 7W–18L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history25 matches
L
2024-07-19 · SPORTIME · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-12 · SPORTIME · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajesh Padmanabhan
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-10 · SPORTIME · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Shores
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-02 · SPORTIME · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
N/A
2024-06-26 · SPORTIME · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Syed Saeed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-06-25 · SPORTIME · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ethan Lampert
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-22 · SPORTIME · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terry Casillo
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-05-21 · SPORTIME · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-05-14 · SPORTIME · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-05-01 · SPORTIME · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Uzzilia
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2022-03-27 · Tennis Menace · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Struther van Horn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2022-03-20 · Tennis Menace · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diem Salmon mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 41.3% of games
4.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 40.9% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
10 matches
#1 Singles
20%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
3 matches
#2 Singles
12%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer