← Search

Amy Gao

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sparks, NV
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
21 matches · 8W–13L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history21 matches
L
2026-05-23 · SOUTH RENO TENNIS 18AW4.0A · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
Default
2026-05-09 · SOUTH RENO TENNIS 18AW4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-11-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with JC Boers mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2024-11-09 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with JC Boers mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-10-27 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Taylor Shigihara mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-12 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jaime Tibaduiza mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-09-22 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Erik Haghjoo mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
W
2024-09-15 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sebastian Alvarez mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-09-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sebastian Alvarez mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-08-31 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Heldt-Werle mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-03-09 · RENO TENNIS CENTER 18MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Niccolo Ripamonti mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-03-09 · RENO TENNIS CENTER 18MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Niccolo Ripamonti mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 62.6% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–8L · 30.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
4 matches
#1 Singles
10%
2 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer