← Search

Lawrence Wolff

— year-end
19 matches · 11W–8L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Lawrence Wolff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
L
2022-07-21 · LI - Kings Park, Dulberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barry Katzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2022-06-22 · LI - Kings Park, Dulberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barry Katzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2021-06-07 · Moramarco · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barry Katzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2019-11-15 · Carefree, Bullaro · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Johnsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2019-10-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Braddock Chow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2019-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Warren Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2019-08-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Warren Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2019-08-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Warren Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2019-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Rosenfeld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
Edward Esrick / Milo Thalrose
2019-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Max Krotman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2019-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Warren Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2019-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Warren Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Teams4 teams · 2020–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.6% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 51.8% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 52.7% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer