← Search

Brian Kaye

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Petersburg, FL
3.5M year-end 2024
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
26 matches · 16W–10L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history26 matches
W
2024-06-16 · SPCC Hagman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne McDaniels mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-09 · SPCC Hagman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lina Chaves mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-7
W
2024-06-02 · SPCC Hagman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne McDaniels mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-03-17 · SPCC Drinking Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lina Chaves mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
W
2024-03-10 · SPCC Drinking Team · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Silvie Bahulova mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-03-03 · SPCC Drinking Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lina Chaves mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-01-21 · SPCC Drinking Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lina Chaves mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
2024-01-14 · SPCC Drinking Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lina Chaves mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2023-10-15 · SPCC Drinking Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lina Chaves mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2023-05-21 · SPCC Hagman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lina Chaves mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-6
W
2023-04-02 · SPCC Hagman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lina Chaves mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2023-03-05 · SPCC Hagman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lina Chaves mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0mixed
61.5%
16W–10L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 54% of the time
#2 Doubles
54%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert