← Search

Marie Wagner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Franklin, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 110W–60L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history170 matches
W
2026-11-01 · X55 6.0 NC Dowd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Curtis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-25 · X55 6.0 NC Dowd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Boris Slogar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-18 · X55 6.0 NC Dowd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Curtis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-10-16 · CX 6.5 NC2 Pence · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Curtis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-10-09 · X55 7.0 NC Zimmerman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Currier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-27 · X55 7.0 NC Zimmerman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Caldwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-26 · CX 6.5 NC2 Pence · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with William Arledge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-19 · X55 7.0 NC Zimmerman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kent Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-09-19 · CX 6.5 NC2 Pence · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with William Arledge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Trina Kelley championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Pinney championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jo Ann Meister championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
78.6%
22W–6L · 61.7% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 42% of games
5.5
100%
13W–0L · 66.1% of games
6.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 55.5% of games
6.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 51.9% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 59.5% of games
6.0mixed
76.2%
32W–10L · 57.2% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
39.3%
11W–17L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
36 matches
#1 Singles
5%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams