← Search

Carolyn Cheverine

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richfield, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
296 matches · 144W–152L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history296 matches
W
2026-11-01 · X55 7.0 NC Zimmerman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Arvidson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-10-16 · CX 6.5 TP2 Fox · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vince Cheverine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-10 · X55 6.0 TP1 Dean · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Scafaro mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-09 · X55 7.0 NC Zimmerman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Arvidson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-04 · CX 6.5 TP2 Fox · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Diego Hernandez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-02 · X55 7.0 NC Zimmerman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Arvidson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · A55 7.0W D CC Westphal · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Freund
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-11 · A18 3.5W TP1 Fox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Ratcliffe
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-10 · X18 7.0 3 TP Rohrig · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Barker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · A40 3.5W TP Fox · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terri Conner
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-06 · A55 7.0W D CC Westphal · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Palus
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · A18 3.5W TP1 Fox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Ratcliffe
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams98 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
52.2%
35W–32L · 52.4% of games
4.0
29.3%
12W–29L · 41.4% of games
6.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.2% of games
7.0
64.4%
29W–16L · 56.7% of games
7.5
32%
8W–17L · 41% of games
3.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 61.6% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 40.2% of games
7.0mixed
48.6%
35W–37L · 49.1% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
140 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
47 matches
#1 Singles
4%
13 matches
#2 Singles
3%
10 matches
Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova