← Search

Christopher Peters

— year-end
62 matches · 25W–37L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Christopher Peters to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2026-07-18 · X18 6.0 TP1 Dean · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Tate mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · A40 3.0M TP Licari · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Leventhal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-13 · A55 6.0M TP Fox · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Lambright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Bob Halper / Fred Bauer
2026-07-06 · A55 6.0M TP Fox · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Leventhal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · A40 3.0M TP Licari · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Cutler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · A55 6.0M TP Fox · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-22 · A55 6.0M TP Fox · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-07 · X18 6.0 TP1 Dean · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Tate mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-02 · A40 3.0M TP Licari · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ron Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Adam Nemastil / Stephanie Mabee
2026-05-31 · X18 6.0 TP1 Dean · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Kaim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Gregory Blatnik / David Benson
2026-05-26 · A40 3.0M TP Licari · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vince Cheverine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-18 · A55 6.0M TP Fox · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ron Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
Teams21 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 41% of games
6.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 49.2% of games
6.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.8% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams