← Search

Elizabeth Harvie

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
219 matches · 91W–128L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history219 matches
L
2026-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Keshia Green championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ragini Singh championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-10-08 · LBible.7.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ragini Singh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-10-06 · LBible.40.7.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lora Alkhawam
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-10-05 · MPaul.8.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sapna Varkey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-22 · LBible.40.7.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Santae Cooper
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Motsinger championship
loading the estimate
2-2
W
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lorraine Hall championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Motsinger championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Motsinger championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-15 · LBible.40.7.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Cooley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-14 · MPaul.8.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sapna Varkey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.9% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 27.4% of games
4.0
48.4%
46W–49L · 47.4% of games
4.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 41.5% of games
7.5
45.2%
19W–23L · 47.5% of games
8.5
26.3%
5W–14L · 39.9% of games
4.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 51.1% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 51% of games
8.0mixed
11.1%
2W–16L · 33.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
53 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams