← Search

Richard Lucas

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
PASADENA, MD
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 38W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history80 matches
L
2026-07-19 · Martin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Corbiere mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-17 · Martin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Corbiere mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-07 · Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tina Rohm mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-30 · Walsh · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gia Jang mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-11-02 · Walsh · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Claire Rossmark mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-02-23 · See You in Court · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Trochimowicz mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-02-02 · See You in Court · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Saia mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-01-05 · See You in Court · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Saia mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-23 · Kuhn 2024 Mens 4.0 40+ · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-14 · Kuhn 2024 Mens 4.0 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Moskios
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-07-11 · Kuhn 2024 Mens 4.0 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hongbo Ma
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-06-19 · Kuhn 2024 Mens 4.0 40+ · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.2% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 45.8% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
21W–18L · 52.3% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#1 Singles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches
#3 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal