← Search

David Lynch

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 128W–98L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history226 matches
W
2026-10-27 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-29 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-15 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Salim Virani
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-08 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
Default
2026-06-28 · PRC - Nace/ Pieper · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Berg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-24 · Highland Park - O'Brien/Nichols · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Gutman
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-23 · PRC - Nace/ Pieper · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Rodgers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · Highland Park - O'Brien/Nichols · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benton Weinacker
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-31 · Life Time - Strickland/Nelson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Mullen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-20 · Highland Park - O'Brien/Nichols · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lukus Nelson
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · Life Time - Strickland/Nelson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Mullen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lukus Nelson championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.5% of games
3.5
58.4%
45W–32L · 52.2% of games
4.0
36%
9W–16L · 45.1% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 55.4% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 49.6% of games
3.5mixed
72%
18W–7L · 59.9% of games
4.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 43.3% of games
6.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 62.8% of games
7.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 37.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
46 matches
#2 Singles
11%
25 matches
#1 Singles
11%
24 matches
Singles
7%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer