← Search

Rhonda Shaffer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birdsboro, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 15W–16L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history31 matches
W
2026-09-27 · Hillcrest · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Blume
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-23 · Hillcrest · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Crossan
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-09 · Hillcrest · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Christman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-10-26 · Hillcrest · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Christman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-10-05 · Hillcrest · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dawn Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-01-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Fletcher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-12-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Christman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-11-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Fletcher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-11-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Flowers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
Christina Naughton / Laura Ammermann
2024-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Fletcher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-02-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Crossan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-02-04 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Flowers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 44.6% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer