← Search

Laura Ammermann

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saylorsburg, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 12W–14L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history26 matches
L
2026-10-31 · Love All · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Harriet Breuninger
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-17 · Love All · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Abel
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-10-10 · Love All · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Harriet Breuninger
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-03 · Love All · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Krista Marsh
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-22 · Love All · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Regina Gotchel
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-11-16 · Love All · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cecilia Yost
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-26 · Love All · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Werder
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-12-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christina Naughton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2024-11-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gail Urland
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christina Naughton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christina Naughton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christina Naughton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
48%
12W–13L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe