← Search

Kathryn North

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bonita Springs, FL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 9W–21L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history30 matches
L
2026-10-29 · Bonita Bay / Spears · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Reardon
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-26 · Bonita Bay / K. North · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Lachner
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-15 · Bonita Bay / Spears · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Spears
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2024-11-04 · Bonita Bay - North · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Stencel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-10-28 · Bonita Bay - North · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Lachner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-10-14 · Bonita Bay - North · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Spears
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
L
2024-03-04 · Bonita Bay - North · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Spears
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-02-29 · Bonita Bay - North · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Morley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-02-26 · Bonita Bay - North · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Morley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-02-12 · Bonita Bay - North · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darla Highley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
W
2024-02-07 · Bonita Bay - North · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Morley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-01-29 · Bonita Bay - North · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Nettler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 40% of games
7.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 60% of the time
#2 Doubles
60%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert