← Search

Katie Neuman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
MANTOLOKING, NJ
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 32W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history74 matches
L
2026-03-02 · Sterling Oaks/ Globerman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Colgate
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-16 · Sterling Oaks/ Globerman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Colgate
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-02 · Sterling Oaks/ Globerman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Colgate
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
L
2025-03-03 · Sterling Oaks / Globerman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Johnston
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-17 · Sterling Oaks / Globerman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Kriek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-24 · Matchpoint · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith Ames
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-06-10 · Matchpoint · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Haren Haber
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-03-18 · Stonebridge - Small-Carroll · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Delisi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-03-11 · Stonebridge - Small-Carroll · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Delisi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-03-04 · Stonebridge - Small-Carroll · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melinda Abood
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2024-02-26 · Stonebridge - Small-Carroll · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Lee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-07-31 · Matchpoint: You've Been Served · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia King
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
25%
3W–9L · 41.2% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
47.5%
28W–31L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert