← Search

Vittorio Viarengo

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Jose, CA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
209 matches · 137W–72L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history209 matches
L
2026-10-26 · ALMADEN VAC 55MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Campbell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-25 · SILVER CREEK CM7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pramod Immaneni
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-10-24 · ALMADEN VAC 55MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret A. Roderick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-10-15 · ALMADEN VAC 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dina Nevarez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-08 · SILVER CREEK CM7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pramod Immaneni
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-09-23 · ALMADEN VAC 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dina Nevarez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · ALMADEN VAC 55AM8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chalam Kalahasti championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-13 · SILVER CREEK 18AM4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Stebbins
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-07 · SILVER CREEK 18AM4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Stebbins
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · ALMADEN VAC 55AM8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chalam Kalahasti
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-03-29 · ALMADEN VAC 55AM8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chalam Kalahasti
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-22 · SILVER CREEK 40AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pranit Sethi
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
67.6%
48W–23L · 55.5% of games
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 38.5% of games
7.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 55% of games
7.5
68.2%
15W–7L · 59.4% of games
8.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.5% of games
8.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 50.8% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
70.7%
41W–17L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
37 matches
#1 Singles
7%
15 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams