← Search

Dina Nevarez

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Jose, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
411 matches · 261W–150L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history411 matches
L
2026-11-01 · ALMADEN VAC CW7.5A · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrea Sargis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-17 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Donna Kaneko
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-15 · ALMADEN VAC 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vittorio Viarengo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-14 · ALMADEN VAC CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrea Sargis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-10-11 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC CW8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Annie Dang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-10 · ALMADEN VAC 55MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Cannon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-10-08 · ALMADEN VAC CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lori Ruiz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-28 · ALMADEN VAC 55MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Raphael Durst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-27 · ALMADEN VAC 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Raphael Durst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-23 · ALMADEN VAC 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vittorio Viarengo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-21 · ALMADEN VAC CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrea Sargis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vladimir Libershteyn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams84 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
83.3%
15W–3L · 70.4% of games
3.5
51.5%
17W–16L · 53.2% of games
4.0
54.5%
60W–50L · 50.4% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 69.3% of games
7.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 65.7% of games
7.5
62.2%
23W–14L · 56.3% of games
8.0
74.2%
23W–8L · 55.8% of games
8.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 47.2% of games
6.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 57.1% of games
7.0mixed
69.2%
27W–12L · 59.5% of games
8.0mixed
64.9%
50W–27L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
201 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
135 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
66 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams