← Search

Lorraine Jacko

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Canonsburg, PA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 68W–88L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history156 matches
L
2026-08-06 · Still Got it · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Rebish
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-13 · Still Got it · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Rebish
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · Still Got it · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Rebish
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-12 · Still Got it · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Rebish
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-21 · Still Got it · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Bidaman
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-11 · Still Got it · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jarol Devoge
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Bidaman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jarol Devoge
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
W
2024-07-27 · Party at the Net · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Chan
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-07-14 · Party at the Net · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Stewart
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-07-11 · Party at the Net · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Stewart
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa McGrosky-Kleja
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 49.8% of games
3.5
45.6%
26W–31L · 48.4% of games
7.0
38.6%
17W–27L · 48.7% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 48.2% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 38.2% of games
7.0mixed
54.3%
19W–16L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams