← Search

Carla Lavrusky

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gibsonia, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 47W–35L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history82 matches
L
2026-08-06 · Silver Slammers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Costa
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · Silver Slammers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Costa
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-09 · Ageless Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Costa
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · Silver Slammers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Costa
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · Ageless Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marilyn Stack
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-21 · Silver Slammers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Costa
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-08-13 · Oxford North · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Leibensperger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-08-01 · Oxford North · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Arla Baker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-13 · Oxford North · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Leibensperger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
W
2025-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Hromyak
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-6
L
2025-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Hromyak
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-6
L
2024-07-31 · Golden Aces · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Sue Certo -newcamp
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 57.3% of games
4.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 54.9% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
75%
9W–3L · 57.7% of games
8.0
48.5%
16W–17L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal