← Search

Isaac MacOn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Louisville, TN
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 38W–24L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history62 matches
W
2026-08-27 · Hadley Park III-Lime/Baker · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Carl Ragland
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
Chris Mitchell / John Peyton
2026-08-20 · Hadley Park III-Lime/Baker · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Will McDermott
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-06 · Hadley Park III-Lime/Baker · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with T Scott Baker
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · Hadley Park III-Lime/Baker · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Eli MacOn
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
Gene Edwards / Terry Correll
2026-07-16 · Hadley Park III-Lime/Baker · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jamie Lee
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
Chris Howard / Chris Mitchell
2026-07-09 · Hadley Park III-Lime/Baker · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Carl Ragland
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · Hadley Park III-Lime/Baker · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Glenn Kiger
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
Rich Pankow / Kevin Glasgow
2026-06-11 · Hadley Park III-Lime/Baker · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Glenn Kiger
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · Hadley Park III-Lime/Baker · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Yukari Moriyama
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-07 · Hadley Park III-Lime/Baker · #1 Singles · 0.0
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-30 · Hadley Park III-Lime/Baker · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Carl Ragland
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-05-19 · Macon/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jake Ward
loading the estimate
1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.7% of games
4.0
60%
9W–6L · 57.7% of games
4.5
65.5%
19W–10L · 53.4% of games
8.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
10 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert