← Search

Megan Nordhagen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mooresville, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 70W–43L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history113 matches
L
2026-07-01 · TLAGA-Gandy-Childers/Edgemoor · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Ray
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · TLAGA-Gandy-Childers/Edgemoor · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Lunsford
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-17 · TLAGA-Gandy-Childers/Edgemoor · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Freeman
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-11 · LAGA-Gandy/Childers/CRP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katrina Childers
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · LAGA-Gandy/Childers/CRP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Hulse-Mack
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-06 · LAGA-Gandy/Childers/CRP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Schaeper
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-31 · LAGA-Gandy/Childers/CRP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Schacher
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-30 · LAGA-Gandy/Childers/CRP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Schaeper
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-03-23 · LAGA-Gandy/Childers/CRP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Schaeper
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-08-19 · TLAGA-Gandy-Childers/CRP TRI B · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Ray
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-07-22 · TLAGA-Gandy-Childers/CRP TRI B · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Perrino
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-16 · TLAGA-Gandy-Childers/CRP TRI B · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Gandy
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 64.2% of games
3.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 46.2% of games
3.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 62.1% of games
4.0
42.3%
11W–15L · 47.1% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 57% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 58.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
28 matches
#1 Singles
7%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert