← Search

Stan Jastrzebski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Columbia, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 52W–8L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history60 matches
L
2026-08-29 · April Edwards · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beverly Horvit mixed
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-29 · April Edwards · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beverly Horvit mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · April Edwards · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Thies mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-23 · April Edwards · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Thies mixed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · Nicole Brooks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicole Brooks mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-18 · Nicole Brooks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicole Brooks mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · April Edwards · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Spencer mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-10-04 · Stan Jastrzebski · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Everett
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-04 · Stan Jastrzebski · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with S Hasan Naqvi
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-10-04 · Stan Jastrzebski · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with S Hasan Naqvi
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Carolee Jones / Robert Jones
2024-08-10 · Hodges - Columbia · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Crist mixed championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-07-25 · Hodges - Columbia · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Crist mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
100%
14W–0L · 63.5% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
87%
20W–3L · 61.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
15 matches
Singles
15%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
5 matches
#1 Male Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova