← Search

Christopher Caya

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 25W–47L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history72 matches
W
2026-10-24 · CHI E 40M3.0 1.Wilm McMahon Sat 1 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brad Fujii
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-10-10 · CHI E M40.7.0 1.Wilm Mesh Sat 5 $20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Cassier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-10 · CHI E 40M3.0 1.Wilm McMahon Sat 1 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barney Straus
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-11 · CHI E M40.7.0 1.Wilm Mesh Sat 5 $20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with DANIELLE ARENDS mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-23 · CDTA S M18&O7.0 2.Wilm Stone Sun 1 $20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julianne Hartzell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-6
L
2026-08-02 · CDTA S M18&O7.0 2.Wilm Stone Sun 1 $20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mandy Shaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-26 · CDTA S M18&O7.0 2.Wilm Stone Sun 1 $20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eva Szubzda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-11 · CDTA S 40&OM3.0 2.Wilm McMahon Sat 1 $20 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Dillow
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-5
L
2026-06-28 · CDTA S M18&O7.0 2.Wilm Stone Sun 1 $20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leslie Sauer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · CDTA S 40&OM3.0 2.Wilm McMahon Sat 1 $20 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Dillow
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-07-20 · CDTA S 18&OM3.0 6.Centennial McMahon Sat 1 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barney Straus
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-07-15 · CDTA S 18&OM3.0 6.Centennial McMahon Sat 1 $20 · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
37.9%
25W–41L · 44.8% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 33.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
24 matches
#1 Singles
22%
16 matches
#2 Singles
19%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer