← Search

Todd Riggs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 35W–49L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history84 matches
L
2026-10-24 · CHI E 40M3.0 4.Wilm Mesh Sat 7 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Snyders
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-19 · CHI E 40M3.0 4.Wilm Mesh Sat 7 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Snyders
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-5
W
2026-09-19 · CHI E 55M6.0 1.Wilm Mesh Sat 11 $20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steven Betts
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
Default
2026-08-23 · CDTA S 55&OM6.0 2.Wilm Mesh-2 Sat 11 $20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alan Mesh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-09 · CDTA S 55&OM6.0 2.Wilm Mesh-2 Sat 11 $20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Rubanovich
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-2, 1-0
W
Default
2026-07-11 · CDTA S 55&OM6.0 2.Wilm Mesh-2 Sat 11 $20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Earl Stoner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-06-13 · CDTA S 55&OM6.0 2.Wilm Mesh-2 Sat 11 $20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martin Gruner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-25 · CDTA W 40&OM3.0 1.Wlmt Mesh Sat 5 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Rubanovich
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-18 · CDTA W 40&OM3.0 1.Wlmt Mesh Sat 5 $20 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawn Budde
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · CDTA W 40&OM3.0 1.Wlmt Mesh Sat 5 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawn Budde
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-21 · CDTA W 40&OM3.0 1.Wlmt Mesh Sat 5 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Snyders
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-28 · CDTA W 40&OM3.0 1.Wlmt Mesh Sat 5 $20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Snyders
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
38.2%
26W–42L · 45.6% of games
6.0
100%
5W–0L · 76.6% of games
6.5mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 40% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer