Search

Seok Nichols

Gig Harbor, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
90 matches · 49W–41L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.54
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
29%
down to 3.5
71%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 17% down · 83% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.58. Higher than today’s 3.54 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.0
664 of 782

Seok is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Seok has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Seok has gone from the 43rd to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 66.8% of games
4.0
37%
17W–29L · 47% of games
7.0mixed
70%
14W–6L · 56.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Wallen
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Quoc Nguyen / Stefan Green
2026-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Ahlstrom
+0.051better than expected — took 71% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Lieuw
+0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Graeme Chapman / Anthony Caruso
2026-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Lieuw
0.010below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Brian Johnson / Mike McDermott
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Ahlstrom
0.013below expectation — took 47% of games against 52% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Matthew Sheets / McKee Buxton
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Ahlstrom
+0.009better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-01-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Ahlstrom
+0.030better than expected — took 65% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Marco Esquivel / Susanna Buttorffmixed
2025-12-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erika Sagle
+0.000about as expected — took 65% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-11-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shannon Gerritzen
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-11-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erika Sagle
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erika Sagle
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shannon Gerritzen
+0.000about as expected — took 25% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.