Vincent Langan
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
84 matches · 33W–51L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history84 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2025
NNM Adult 65 & Over 7.0M Tabish - JC
NNM 7.0M Martinez-JC
NNM 7.0M Tabish - JC
3.5M JC-Dreike
NNM 7.0 JC - Brock
NNM 7.0M JC - Tabish
NNM/Tabish/65 & Over/7.0M
NNM 3.5M JC - Dreike
NNM 7.0M Chambliss
NNM 7.0M JC - Chambliss
NNM 7.0MX JC - Goldstein
NNM 7.0MX NDB - Goldstein
NNM 3.5M JC - Dreike
NNM 7.0M JC - Chambliss
JC-Langan
NNM 3.5M JC - Hatcher
NNM3.5M40_Burns_JC
Southwest/Chambliss/65 & Over7.0 Men
NNM7.0M55_Chambliss_JC
NNM7.0M65_Chambliss_JC
NNM7.0X40_Delfrate_HP
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
30.8%
8W–18L · 46.1% of games
7.0
43.5%
20W–26L · 45.9% of games
7.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 48.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
13 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.