John Loges
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tijeras, NM
99 matches · 56W–43L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history99 matches
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 5-7
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2025
NNM Adult 65 & Over 7.0M Tabish - JC
NNM 7.0M Martinez-JC
NNM 7.0M Tabish - JC
3.5M JC-Dreike
NNM 7.0M JC - Tabish
NNM/Tabish/65 & Over/7.0M
NNM 3.5M JC - Dreike
NNM 7.0M Chambliss
NNM 7.0M JC - Chambliss
NNM 7.0MX NDB - Goldstein
NNM 3.5M JC - Dreike
NNM 7.0M JC - Chambliss
NNM 3.5M JC - Hatcher
NNM3.5M40_Burns_JC
Southwest/Chambliss/65 & Over7.0 Men
NNM3.5M18_Vencill_Can
NNM3.5M40_Vencill_Can
NNM7.0M55_Modrich_JC
NNM7.0M65_Panzarella_JC
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
46.4%
13W–15L · 49.7% of games
7.0
61.8%
42W–26L · 55.4% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.