← Search

Annette Younkins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Phoenix, AZ
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 16W–35L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history51 matches
L
2024-12-05 · 6.0 TPR VolleyQueens W65F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maryellen Mikwold
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-31 · 6.0 TPR VolleyQueens W65F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Grace Vogel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-10-24 · 6.0 TPR VolleyQueens W65F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Bergendahl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
L
2024-10-17 · 6.0 TPR VolleyQueens W65F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debra Kangas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2024-10-10 · 6.0 TPR VolleyQueens W65F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rhonda Taylor
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-04 · 6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65S · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judith Quinn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-21 · 6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65S · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gina Liu
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-03-07 · 6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65S · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debra Kangas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-02-22 · 6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65S · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rhonda Taylor
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
W
2024-02-01 · 6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65S · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debra Kangas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-01-13 · 6.0 MTC Racquettes W55F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynda Michaluk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-12-07 · 6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joanne Dunn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
6.0
24.4%
10W–31L · 40.2% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.8% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King