← Search

Sasha Larson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Scottsdale, AZ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 8W–30L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history38 matches
L
2025-01-25 · 6.0 KIW Net Stalkers W55S · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Meg Howell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-01-16 · 7.0 ISP Howell W65F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meg Howell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-12-14 · FALL 6.0 KIW Net Stalkers W55F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joanne Itow
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-12-12 · 7.0 ISP Howell W65F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joy Smarr
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-12-05 · 7.0 ISP Howell W65F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Miriam Spizzirri
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-10-26 · FALL 6.0 KIW Net Stalkers W55F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Miriam Spizzirri
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-10-24 · 7.0 ISP Howell W65F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Miriam Spizzirri
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-10-12 · FALL 6.0 KIW Net Stalkers W55F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joanne Itow
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-10-10 · 7.0 ISP Howell W65F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joy Smarr
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-11 · 7.0 ISP WelshFrank W65S · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Welsh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-04 · 7.0 ISP WelshFrank W65S · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Klima
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2024-03-21 · PHX/Howell/65&O/6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Miriam Spizzirri
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.6% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
60%
6W–4L · 59.3% of games
7.0
6.7%
1W–14L · 34.6% of games
8.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 24% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King